The overall presentation of this resource was done brilliantly and looked amazing as a wordpress website. All the parts were nicely split up in a way that each flowed into the next one, making it very easy to follow. The navigation bar combined with effective headers and bullet points made the resource very easy to read and follow along.

I found the interactivity of this resource to be very inclusive, it allows the students to guide the conversation rather than having a teacher direct everything. I really think this way of learning is important and much more effective then more directed learning. Letting the students guide the conversation and bounce ideas back and forth is a great way to include everyone into the plan. With a topic that is important and sensitive such as this one, I like that the plan emphasizes on correcting inappropriate comments but not on punishing as many students may have little to no knowledge on the topic.

I think it’s possible that the learning outcomes and activities could be more focused rather than having separate outcomes for each of the 5 parts. However, I do think it looks better how you’ve done it, I just question this since it becomes 15 learning outcomes in total when the assignment outline describes 2-4. I believe this will make the resource very tough to complete for a group of 15-20 students in 1-2 hours. I think it would be nice if the learning outcomes from part 1-5 were all the same and each part built further on the same learning outcomes that were introduced in the opening discussion or even could be in the resource overview.

There were very few corrections that I could find. One was a blank bullet point under teacher resources, which possibly was incomplete as this was just a draft. If not, I would suggest the section for teacher resources could simply be removed. Another possible suggestion for the website design could be instead of having the resource overview links routing to their own page, you could create anchors on each header. That way they don’t have to navigate back to the overview page to see the other headers.

It’s hard to emphasize how good I think this project is in a peer review as I’m mostly supposed to be finding critiques but I thinks it’s important I mention that this was done extremely well. The presentation of the site, the flow of each part and the thought that went into building this resource are all amazing. Nicely done!